Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

个队准就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神面向进论述，兼性与共性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时与共时及跨文本、跨文化宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作为为论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个就所给定的展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验，于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨本、跨宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作为为性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一为与为理论，基于“犯罪为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作理论，基于“犯罪是”这一刑法学中的先验，对于不作性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理逆题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化宏观视野阐述此题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法先验题，对于不作为为性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个就所给定的展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验，于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何其进合理说明。