Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,
术与神通两大面向进
论述,兼备历
与共
跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与为理论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为
为
的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词类均由互联网资源自动生成,部
未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原的
也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此
。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作与
论,基于“犯罪是
”这一刑法学中的先验
,对于不作
性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合
说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理的逆也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进
论述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此
。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
一是不作为与
为理论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中的先验
,对于不作为
为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对
进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,分未经过人工审核,
表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问
,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与为理论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,
于不作为
为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是
其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定命题展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理逆命题也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部分旨在探讨《灯草》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进
论述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨
本、跨
宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与为理论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中
先验命题,对于不作为
为性
结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔
」
「
」,
从幻术与神通两大面向进
论述,兼备历时性与共时性
本、
化的宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与为理论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为
为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性类均由互联网资源自动生成,部
未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的命题展开。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一不作
与
理
,基于“犯罪
”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作
性的结
应
毋庸质疑,关键
如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理的逆命题也有可能。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进
论述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
不作为与
为理论,基于“犯罪
为”这
刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为
为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键
如何对
进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生,部分未经过人工审核,
表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Who will set the papers for the examination?
这次考试由谁来命题?
The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.
两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。
It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.
当然该原理的逆命题也有立。
The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.
第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」,分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述,兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一为与
为理论,基于“犯罪
为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于
为
为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键
如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦
代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。