Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作与理，基于“犯罪是”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作性结毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作理论，基于“犯罪是”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一不作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪行为”这一刑法学中命题，对于不作为行为性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键对其进行合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中先验，于不作为行为性结论应当毋庸质，是如何其进行合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一不作为与为理论，基于“犯为”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作为为性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键如何对其进合理说。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作与行理论，基于“犯罪是行”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作行性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是为与行为理论，基“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中先验命题，对为行为性结论应当疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作为行为性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是与行理论，基于“犯罪是行”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于行性结论应质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。