However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，的证据指出蜥龙是种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现的初被认为是属于细小的蜥脚下目，但估计牠是属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，最近的证据指出近蜥龙是种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密发现的化石最初被认为是属于细小的蜥脚下目，但估计牠是属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

是，最近证据指出近蜥龙是种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现化石最初被认为是属于细小蜥脚下目，估计牠是属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但，证据指出蜥龙种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现化石初被认为属于细小蜥脚下目，但估计牠属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，最近证据指出近蜥龙是种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽苏里州发现化石最初被认为是属于细小蜥脚下目，但估计牠是属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

，最近证据指出近蜥龙种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现化石最初被认为属于细小蜥脚下目，估计牠属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，最的证据指出是种早期脚类恐，而非原脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现的化石最初被认为是属于细小的脚下目，但估计牠是属于鸭嘴超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，最近的证据指出近龙是种早期脚类恐龙，而脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现的最初被认为是属于细小的脚下目，但估计牠是属于鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，最近证据指出近蜥龙是种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现化石最初被认为是属蜥脚下目，但估计牠是属鸭嘴龙超科。

However, recent evidence suggests that Anchisaurus is an early sauropod, not a prosauropod.

但是，最的证据蜥龙是种早期蜥脚类恐龙，而非原蜥脚类。

It is believed to be a hadrosaur, although the Missouri remains were first thought to belong to a small sauropod ("Neosaurus", renamed Parrosaurus).

虽然在密苏里州发现的化石最初被认为是属于细小的蜥脚下目，但估计牠是属于鸭嘴龙超科。