Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯
父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以
这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动
，
分未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是
权
统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资
生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以
这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文「
雄风」，不「雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例
、词
分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这
是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性
类均由互联网资源自动生，未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可
说
纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不
，
又如何解释呢？
声明：
上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经
人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其
达内容亦不
软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中
「展雄风」，不「展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词类均由互联网资源自动生成，部未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展
」，
说「大展雌」一样。过，这些又如何解释呢？
声明：
句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦
代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄」，不说「大展
」
样。不过，以这些又如
呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，说「大展雌风」一样。过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表达内容
表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。