He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的而换上宗教保守主义的，是换了箝制言论自由的观，并能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信。

We have freedom of speech .

们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心过“诽谤书籍”的作。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信。

We have freedom of speech .

们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心过“诽谤书籍”的作。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强，版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰。

We have freedom of speech .

有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小写过“诽谤书籍”的作。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强，版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义衣而换上宗教保守主义衣，不过是换了箝制言观，并不能促进言。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书”者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自的观，并不能促进言论自。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。