The burden of proof isn't on me.

举责任不在于我。

You carry the burden of proof.

而你有举责任。

They said the definition of annoying or nuisance behaviour was too wide and the burden of proof too low.

称对烦人或讨厌行为的定义过于宽泛，举责任太轻。

But the burden of proof at this point is on Democrats.

但此时举责任在民主党人身上。

Now the burden of proof is on those facing discrimination.

现在，举责任落在那些面临歧视的人身上。

The state hasn't met its burden here.

此案检方没有尽到的举责任。

What about de facto of burden?

那举责任呢？

When did the burden shift? - When he was convicted.

被判有罪后 在上诉时被告成了控方 需承担举责任明自己无罪-举责任 何时转到被告身上了 -被判有罪时。

So there's been a reversal of the burden of proof in like you have to show that you're not doing bad.

所以举责任已经发生了逆转，你必须明你没有做坏事。

The SEC decided they had no case, and their burden of proof is lower.

所没觉得有问题，而且的举责任也很小。

Burden of proof In a court of law, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution.

在法庭上，举责任在于检方。

Proving libel is much easier in Britain than in the United States, because there the burden of proof rests with the defendant.

在英国要明诽谤比在美国容易得多，因为英国的举责任在于被告。

This leads to a handy rule of thumb: the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.

这导致了一个方便的经验法则：举责任在于提出索赔的人。

The new deal shifts the burden of proof regarding such harm. To avoid penalties, defendants will have to show that it did not happen.

新协议取消了关于这种损害的举责任。为了避免处罚，被告必须明没有发生。

If she'd gone to trial, the burden of proof would be on the prosecution, yet her own lawyer told her to take the deal.

如果她坚持要庭审，举责任会在原告身上，可连她自己的律师都在劝她签署协议。

It's quite transformative because in the past, the burden of proof lied with regulators, so they had to prove Facebook or Apple were breaking EU law, that they were undermining competitors.

这是非常大的变革，因为过去举责任在于监管机构，所以必须明 Facebook 或苹果违反了欧盟法律，明在破坏竞争对手。

So when all the available evidence suggests that humans are causing an increase in global temperatures, the burden of proof has been fulfilled— if you disagree, it becomes your responsibility to prove otherwise.

因此，当所有可用据表明人类正在导致全球气温升高时，举责任就已经完成——如果您不同意，则您有责任明并非如此。

In a fundamental departure from the centuries-old traditions of Anglo-American law, the government need only make a superficial or prima facie case, based on gross numbers, to shift the burden of proof to the accused.

从根本上背离了英美法律几个世纪以来的传统，政府只需要根据总数提出一个表面或表面据确凿的案件，即可将举责任转移给被告。