Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属分属于同一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同情况下具有程度意上不同,意上不同制约着它们句法功能不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析分这样一个发展过程。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB状态容词,在相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB状态容词,在相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有程度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又改变语法属性的成分属于一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

根ABB式状态形容词,在相的情况下具有程度意义上的,意义上的制约着它们句法功能的。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心词到次要词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有程度意上的不同,意上的不同制约着它们法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样个发展过程。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同ABB态形容词,在相同的情况下具有程度意上的不同,意上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有程度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改语法属性成分属于同一句法类型。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同情况下具有程度意义上不同,意义上不同制约着它们句法功能不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”句法演经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析成分这样一个发展过程。