For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文】 < >The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.

For them intelligibility has to do with word or ut- terance recognition,comprehensibility with word or utterance meaning,and interpretability with illocutionary force.

【中文摘要】 < 正>The Issue of Intelligibility Smith and Nelson(1985),cited in Taylor(2003),distin- guish between intelligibility,comprebensibility,and inter- pretability.