Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这
刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应
质疑,关键是如何对
进行合理说明。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这
刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应
质疑,关键是如何对
进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作理论,基于“犯罪是
”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作
的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是作为与行为理论,
“
罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,
作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何
其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这
刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应
质疑,关键是如何对
进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一不作为与行为理论,基于“
行为”这一刑法学中的先验
,
于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键
如何
其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作与
理论,基于“犯罪是
”
一刑法学中
命题,对于不作
性
结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这
法
的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与为
论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中
先验命题,对于不作为
为性
结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这
法
的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。