The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理论之外，或牵强附会加以解释，如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可以对死刑控制起到立竿见影的效果，但，通过实体控制死刑，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪行为”这刑法学中的先验命题，对于作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键如何对其进行合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法是不同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理论之外，或牵强附会加以解释，不如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽宪法或者刑法可以对死刑到立竿见影的效果，但是，实体死刑，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与法是不同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于法理论之外，或牵强附会加以解释，不如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通法或者法可以对制起到立竿见影的效果，但是，通实体制，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪是行为”这一法学中的先验命题，对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理论之外，或牵强附会加以解释，如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可以对死刑控制起到立竿见影的效果，但，通过实体控制死刑，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭的被害人的承诺则仅指为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一为与行为理论，基于“犯罪行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键如何对其进行合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法是不同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理，或牵强附会加解释，不如名正言顺地加承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可对死刑控制起到立竿见影的效果，但是，通过实体控制死刑，存在难的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为理，基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为行为性的结应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法是不同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法之外，或牵强附会加以解释，不如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可以对死刑控制起到立竿见影的效果，但是，通过实体控制死刑，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为，于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为行为性的结应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法不同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理论之外，或牵强附会加以解释，不如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可以对死刑控制起到立竿见影的效果，但，通过实体控制死刑，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一不作为与行为理论，基于“行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键如何对其进行合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课解释说民法与刑法是不同的。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理论之外，或牵强附会加以解释，不如名正言顺地加以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可以对死刑控制起到立竿见影的效果，但是，通过实体控制死刑，存在难以克服的局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害的承诺则仅指作刑法中的正当而存在的被害的同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作与理论，基于“犯罪是”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

The lecturer continued that civil law was different to criminal law.

讲课人继续解释说民法与刑法是不同。

So we should acknowledge it openly rather than let it dissociate from the criminal law theory or interpret it irrelevantly.

因此，与其让它游离于刑法理论之外，或牵强附会以解释，不如名正言以承认。

Constitution or criminal law can get effect instantly on controlling death penalty.However, the substantive control ways have some insuppressible localization.

尽管通过宪法或者刑法可以对死刑控制起到立竿见果，但是，通过实体控制死刑，存在难以克服局限性。

The victim's promise in a marrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义被害人承诺则仅指作为刑法中正当化行为而存在被害人同意。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与行为理论，基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中先验命题，对于不作为行为性结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进行合理说明。