He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁论搅昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是论由强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚论无意间触到了别人痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这是一种无知疯癫论，即使朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有论由。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬保护策略、国家管控其他愚民论已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏论增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义外衣而换上宗教保守主义外衣，不过是换了箝制论由外观，并不能促进论由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、论由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁的搅昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他自由的强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚的无意间触到了别人的痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这一种无知疯癫的，即使来自莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有自由。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬的保护策略、国家管控其他愚民已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见的增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性的。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的外衣而换上宗教保守主义的外衣，不过换了箝自由的外观，并不能促进自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁言论搅昏头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚言论无意间触到别人痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这是一种无知疯癫言论，即使来莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬保护策略、国家管控其他愚民言论已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见言论增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性言论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义外衣而上宗教保守主义外衣，不过是制言论外观，并不能促进言论。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁的搅昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他自由的强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚的无意间触到了别人的痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这一种无知疯癫的，即使来自莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有自由。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬的保护策略、国家管控其他愚民已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见的增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性的。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的外衣而换上宗教保守主义的外衣，不过换了箝自由的外观，并不能促进自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁的昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是自由的强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚的无意间触到了别人的痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这是一种无知疯癫的，即使来自莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有自由。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬的保护策略、国家管控其他愚民已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见的增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性的。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的外衣而换上宗教保守主义的外衣，过是换了箝制自由的外，能促进自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

被粗鲁言论搅昏。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

是言论强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚言论无意间触到别人痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这是一种无知疯癫言论，即使来莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬保护策略、国家管控其愚民言论已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见言论增加。

He took up offensive words.

发出攻击性言论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义外衣而换上宗教保守主义外衣，不过是换箝制言论外观，并不能促进言论。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁的言论搅昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他言论自由的仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚的言论无意间触到了别人的痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这一种无知疯癫的言论，即使来自莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬的保护策略、国家管控其他愚民言论已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见的言论增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性的言论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的外衣而换上宗教保守主义的外衣，换了箝制言论自由的外观，并能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

被粗鲁的言搅昏了。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

言的强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚的言无意间触到了别人的痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这一种无知疯癫的言，即使来莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬的保护策略、国家管控其愚民言已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见的言增加。

He took up offensive words.

发出攻击性的言。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的外衣而换上宗教保守主义的外衣，不过换了箝制言的外观，并不能促进言。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁言论搅昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由强烈信仰。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

于离婚言论无意间触到了别人痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这是一种无知疯癫言论，即使来自莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

们有言论自由。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬保护策略、国家管控其他愚民言论已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见言论增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性言论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主衣而换上宗教保守主衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”作。

He was devastated by the rude remark.

他被粗鲁的言论搅昏了头。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论的强烈信仰者。

My remarks about divorce had unwittingly touched a raw nerve.

我关于离婚的言论无意间触到了别人的痛处。

This is an ignorant and flakey statement, even coming from Sharon Stone.

这是一种无知疯癫的言论，即使来莎朗·斯通。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论。

Politicians preaching protection, state control or other charlatanism have remained on the fringes.

政客们所宣扬的保护策略、国家管控其他愚民言论已经命悬一线。

He said the court provided no guiders guidance about when accusal recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，这将导致声称法官们有偏见的言论增加。

He took up offensive words.

他发出攻击性的言论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的外衣而换上宗教保守主义的外衣，不过是换了箝制言论的外观，并不能促进言论。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。