Who will set the papers for the examination？

次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作与理，基于“犯罪是”一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作性的结应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

次考试由谁来命？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”法学中的先验命，对于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为论，“罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从神通两大面向进论述，兼备历性性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是作为与为理论，基“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是与理论，基于“犯罪是”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准备就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题有能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术神通两大面向进论述，兼备历时性共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐述此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不理论，基于“犯罪是”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。

Who will set the papers for the examination？

这次考试由谁来命题？

The two teams prepared to debate the given proposition.

两个队准就所给定的命题展开辩论。

It is possible, of course, that the converse of this theory may also be true.

当然该原理的逆命题也有可能成立。

The second part is about unearthliness , it is including magic and conjuration.I will also studying unearthliness s Synchrony, Diachrony and its nature by the vision of cross-culture and cross-text.

第二部分旨在探讨《灯草和尚传》「豔异」之「异」，分从幻术与神通两进论，历时性与共时性及跨文本、跨文化的宏观视野阐此命题。

Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.

其一是不作为与为理论，基于“犯罪是为”这一刑法学中的先验命题，对于不作为为性的结论应当毋庸质疑，关键是如何对其进合理说明。