Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法的不往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于一法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”《楚辞》中的法位置有。法位置不，“兮”所表达的语气有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

根ABB式状态形容词,的情况下具有程度意义上的不,意义上的不制约着它们法功能的不。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性成分属于同一句法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘“”《楚辞》中句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“”所表达语气有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,相同情况下具有程度意不同,意不同制约着它们句法功能不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”句法演变经历了由核心动词到次动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存和一般生成语法文献中所论述接应代词相同现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法性的成一句法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不，“兮”所表达的语气有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

根ABB式状态形容词,在相的情况下具有程度意义上的不,意义上的不着它们句法功能的不。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可析的成这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于一句法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不，“兮”所表达的语气有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

根ABB式状态形容词,在相的情况下具有程度意义上的不,意义上的不制约着它们句法功能的不。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的法位置有多种。法位置不同，“兮”所表达的语气有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有程度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又改变语法属性成分属于一句法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘“兮”在《楚辞》中句法位置有多种。句法位置，“兮”所表达语气有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

根ABB式状态形容词,在相情况下具有程度意义上,意义上制约着它们句法功能。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音词“得”句法演变经历了由核心词到词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内可分析成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述接应代词相现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性成分属于同一法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中法位置有多种。法位置不同，“兮”所表达语气有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同情况有程度意义上不同,意义上不同制约着它们法功能不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述接应代词相同现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语某些法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一句法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“兮”所表达的语气有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在同的情况下具有程度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音词“”的句法演变经历了由核心词到次要词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法成分于同一法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中法位置有多种。法位置不同，“兮”所表达语气有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同情况下具有程度意义上不同,意义上不同制约着法功能不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述接应代词相同现象，进而帮助我深入认识汉语某些法质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

Constituents that can be substituted for one another without loss of grammaticality belong to the same syntactic category.

可以相互替换而又不改变语法属性的成分属于同一句法类型。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”《》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“兮”所表达的语气有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,相同的情况下具有程上的不同,上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过程。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。