Paul Ehrlich, an evolutionary biologist and ecologist at Stanford.

斯坦福大的进化生物家和生态家保罗·埃利希说到。

The article by Ehrlich, colleagues and scientist signatories is in the journal BioScience.

这篇由埃利希和同事以及科家签署的文章发表在《生物科》期刊上。

Ehrlich and other experts found Simon's claims preposterous.

埃利希和其他专家认为西蒙的说法很荒谬。

During our research for this show, we spoke to Ehrlich online.

在我们为这个节目做研究的， 我们在线采访了埃利希。

Hi, everyone, I'm Rosemary Miller here with Stephen Ehrlich, the Director of Forbes Digital Assets.

大家好，我是罗斯玛丽·米勒，我是福布斯数字资产总监斯蒂芬·埃利希。

A group led by Professor Ehrlich took the bet and chose five natural resources.

埃利希教授领导的一个小组接受了赌注，选择了五种自资源。

In October 1990, Julian Simon received a check from Paul Ehrlich.

1990 年 10 月，Julian Simon 收到了 Paul Ehrlich 的支票。

Ehrlich believed a growing population would consume such finite resources, and scarcity would drive the prices up.

埃利希认为，不断增长的人口会消耗如此有限的资源，而稀缺性会推高价格。

Betting against Ehrlich was Julian Simon, a professor of business and economics.

与埃利希作对的是商业和教授朱利安·西蒙 (Julian Simon)。

If the price increased, Ehrlich won.

如果价格上涨，埃利希赢了。

He argued that Ehrlich's work, and that of Malthus before him, was based on theoretical calculations, while the real-world data told a different story.

他争辩说，埃利希的工作，以及在他之前的马尔萨斯的工作，都是基于理论计算，而现实世界的数据却讲述了一个不同的故事。

During the same period, the discovery of antibodies and their role in neutralising pathogens also came to light thanks to German physiologists Emil Behring and Paul Ehrlich.

在同一时期，德国生理家埃米尔-贝林（Emil Behring）和保罗-埃利希（Paul Ehrlich）也发现了抗体及其在和病原体方面的作用。

The difference between the economic approach and the hysterical approach to natural resource usage was demonstrated by a bet between economist Julian Simon and environmentalist Paul Ehrlich.

家朱利安·西蒙（Julian Simon）和环保主义者保罗·埃利希（Paul Ehrlich）之间的打赌证明了方法和歇斯底里方法之间对自资源使用的差异。

" Fission and Fusion, " film critic David Ehrlich adds, " Nolan has never come up with a cleaner way of framing the chemical reaction that galvanizes so many of his films."

“裂变与聚变，”影评人大卫·埃利希补充道，“诺兰从来没有想出一个更清晰的方式来构建激发了他许多电影的化反应。”

However, with improving technology, it can actually cost less to acquire future resources when their time comes, as happened with the resources that Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich bet on.

而，随着技术的进步，在未来资源成熟时，获取未来资源的成本实际上可以更低，正如朱利安·西蒙和保罗·埃利希所押注的资源所发生的那样。

Though at the time, he didn't see it, his fate had already been written in the raindrops, Ehrlich continues, leaving Oppenheimer skipping along the surface with a dispassionate remove that can't help but recall the similarly detached Dr. Manhattan.

埃利希接着说，虽当时他没有看到，但他的命运已写在了雨滴里，让奥本海默以冷静的笔触在雨滴表面跳跃，不禁让人想起同样超的曼哈顿博士。

The true enemies of science, argues Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University, a pioneer of environmental studies, are those who question the evidence supporting global warming, the depletion of the ozone layer and other consequences of industrial growth.

斯坦福大的保罗·埃利希，环境研究的先驱，认为真正的科敌人是那些质疑支持全球变暖、臭氧层耗尽以及其他工业增长后果的证据的人。

It's history reframed in such a way that it renders, as film critic David Ehrlich put it; " … discovery inextricable from devastation, creation inextricable from destruction, and the innocent joy of theory inextricable from the unfathomable horror of practice."

它以这样一种方式重构了历史，正如影评人大卫·埃利希（David Ehrlich）所说；“… … 发现与毁灭密不可分，创造与毁灭密不可分，理论的纯真快乐与实践的深不可测的恐怖密不可分。”

Through the 1970s, it seemed like Ehrlich was right: famines, pollution, and political unrest had many concerned that humanity was on the brink of such a crisis, and some governments considered and even implemented policies to limit population growth.

整个 20 世纪 70 年代， 埃利希似乎是对的： 饥荒、污染和政治动荡让许多人担心人类正处于这种危机的边缘， 一些政府考虑甚至实施了限制人口增长的政策。

Simon said he should have placed a wager against Ehrlich years before, when Ehrlich ventured that, " England would not exist in the year 2000." Later that year, Simon called Ehrlich a false prophet and challenged him to a bet.

西蒙说他应该在多年前就对埃利希下注，当时埃利希冒险说：“英格兰将在 2000 年不复存在。 ” 那年晚些时候，西蒙称埃利希为假先知并向他挑战打赌。